| BIBLICAL CREATION - Scientific Proof |
by Sal Giardina
New Creation Ministries, Inc.
Email: sal_pam@mymail.net
|
MARS REPORT: No Life Even though many thousands of scientists today do not believe that the theory of evolution has any scientific merit, our nation continues to spend many millions of dollars in searching for extraterrestrial life in deep space and within our solar system. This is because much of the scientific community is still clinging to a theory which has already been shown by the sciences of geology, thermodynamics, chemistry, microbiology and genetics to be as impossible as anything could be considered to be impossible in science. This statement is based on the numerous advances in modern technology which continuously provide evidences which discredit the evolution theory. In addition, these same scientific disciplines also verify that the established laws of science prohibit the development of life from non-living chemicals. It is not what we do not know about evolution, but what we do know about the confirmed laws of science, which falsify evolution. During the initial Lunar landing missions, the Apollo astronauts were required to be quarantined until it could be determined that no pathogenic microbes were introduced from the Moon. As it turned out, no extraterrestrial microbes or biologic molecules of any kind were found on the astronauts or within any of the numerous Lunar samples. In 1975, two U.S. space probes were launched for the purpose of landing on Mars. The Viking probes were designed to provide images of the terrain and analyze the Martian soil. One of the primary functions of the onboard laboratory was to test for organic molecules or any signs of life such as microbes. The rationale was that "since" life Page 1 |
had evolved on Earth,
some form of life must have also evolved on Mars. Scientists were
hopeful that some evidence of life would be found to bolster the
theory of evolution. However, the extremely expensive and
sophisticated test apparatus did not detect any evidence to support
evolution. Not a trace of a microbe could be found by either of the
probes.
VIKING FAILS TO DETECT LIFE Now using the same reasoning, if evolution had occurred on the Earth, one would expect that at least single-celled forms of life, whether plants, animals, or even viruses would have been detected either by the elaborate Martian experiments or from all the Lunar missions No verified forms of extraterrestrial life have ever been observed. Radio telescopes have also been used for decades by the SETI project. SETI is the organization - Search For Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence. This organization is funded with millions of dollars each year and is managed by NASA. Scientists, including the late Carl Sagan, have been looking for pulsed signals from outer space. These scientists are prepared to accept any basic signal which can be interpreted as coded information as proof of the existence of extraterrestrial life (aliens). No such signals have yet been received, however, this same scientific community refuses to acknowledge the origin of the enormous encyclopedic quantity of complex information which has been found. THE DISCOVERY OF THE DNA MOLECULE HAS UNCOVERED THE MOST ORDERED INFORMATION SEQUENCE IN THE UNIVERSE Page 2 |
| Was this " computer
program" found by a radio telescope searching outer space? No
such luck for the SETI scientists!
But wait--think about the totally illogical and inconsistent explanation which is proposed for this awesome discovery.
In spite of the only rational conclusion that that Life Is The Product of Intelligent Design, much of the misguided scientific community is still trying to give life an evolutionary status. For example: the latest "life on Mars" claim came in the form of scientific hype from the so called Mars rock. The media was very eager to promote the initial speculations but, as usual, the media failed to report with equal vigor that the follow up studies by other secular scientists have become increasingly skeptical. WHAT WAS ACTUALLY FOUND? 1. A potato size rock from Antarctica-Thought to be a meteorite from Mars. 2. Tiny "globules"- Superficially resembling bacteria but not actually identifiable. Concerning Statement Number 1:
It may be theoretically possible for a fragment from Mars to journey to Earth but this would require a precise asteroid impact on Mars hurling the debris into an orbit around the Sun. This orbit would eventually have to cross the Earth’s orbit and result in the capture and survival of the meteor through the Earth’s atmosphere. Page 3 |
Therefore the mineralogy of the so-called meteorite can not provide any significant evidence of Martian origin. The only possible connection to Mars which is offered is the minute quantity of gases trapped within the pores of the rock. Reportedly these gases are similar to the Martian atmosphere. Concerning Statement Number 2:
The evidence cited centers primarily upon the external appearance of small tube-like shapes in the rock. Yes, they are shaped a bit like a possible bacterium but one researcher admitted that such shapes could also be dried up mud. (?) A major problem has already been recognized by scientists, regarding the size of the alleged fossil bacteria. They are simply much smaller than any known existing bacteria and more significant, they are too small to contain the genetic information required by the most rudimentary theoretical self-reproducing cell. This is one reason why William Schopf, a leading expert on microfossils from the University of California, does not believe they represent remnants of biologic activity. Other evidence which is inconsistent with life forms was presented by the director of the Institute Of Meteorites at the University of New Mexico. The accumulating data simply does not justify the initial exuberant claims and media speculations. The Bottom Line:
He is the Chief Cornerstone (Eph. 2:20), The origin of all life (Jn.1:4 ), as well as the ONLY WAY to Eternal Life. Page 4 |
|
So You Want To Believe In Evolution... THEN WHERE'S ALL THE PEOPLE? |
Bible believing
Christians maintain that man was created in God’s image and
likeness, therefore it is difficult to understand how this could
include a transition from apes. In fact, the clear teaching of the
Bible states that man was created fully mature about six thousand
years ago. (Genesis 1)
No one Bible scripture states this and perhaps this is because God knew that man has been known to attempt to explain away any one particular scripture. The 6000 years is determined by adding the total chronological time span of the Biblical patriarchs to the date of established historical events such as the birth of Christ. Some say that the genealogy of the patriarchs contain gaps. They claim that generations might be missing because each descendent listed in Genesis may not have been a son but rather a grandson or great grandson etc. This possibility is irrelevant because the time span between these births is mathematically fixed no matter how many generations may have been missing.
Several textual discrepancies have arisen between the Greek Septuagint and the Hebrew Masoretic texts. These only amount to several hundred years therefore, the 6000 years+ recorded history of man stands. There is no rational way to stretch this figure to millions of years! Evolutionists, including those who teach at many Christian colleges, believe that man is simply a higher form of ape who evolved by chance. According to this popular theory, the genus "Homo" has been evolving for about 2,500,000 years. Page 5 |
Now this hypothesis can
be mathematically tested and compared with the account of creation to
establish which is more plausible. We need only compare the quantity
of physical remains of man found on the planet Earth with the expected
numbers which should remain as fossils or unfossilized bones. After
all, the evolutionists have assured us that fossils, in general, have
been preserved for hundreds of millions of years.
The equation for human population growth is: P= poert P = present human population The current annual growth rate is 1.7%. However, examination of population figures throughout recorded history, which takes into account plagues and wars, indicate that the average growth rate is closer to .5%. Now let's be extremely conservative and not even consider all the expected remains which would have accumulated from Homo erectus and Homo habilis which supposedly have been reproducing for several million years. We are also going to severely limit the calculation to the expected number of graves which modern man would have left, and then for ONLY 100,000 years instead of the 200,000 years proposed by many evolutionists. Going further, the population growth rate will be reduced to .1%. Using these extremely conservative numbers in the above equation yields the Earth’s total population of Homo sapiens which would have lived and died : 5.3(10)43 This number is 5 with 43 zeros after it. This population is a whopping incomprehensible, Page 6 |
| astronomical number! Let
me boil this down to the expected number of graves
(remains/fossils) per acre.
NUMBER OF ACRES ON
THE EARTH
If the evolutionary scenario is even remotely true then: Every time and every where a spade is put in the ground, it should come up filled with modern human bones! As a matter of fact, no matter how deep the excavation or how many miles you probed the Earth with a test boring--you would come up with human remains. Remember this does not even include the entire genus "Homo" whose remains could not be contained in the entire globe of the Earth even if it were hollow. Page 7 |
BIBLICAL
SCENARIO:
We are now in a position to compare this unrealistic situation with the clear teaching of the Bible. Initial Population after the flood: 8 people
As you can see, this figure agrees with the current population of our planet (see graph). It is clear that the population growth figures are undeniably in accord with the Biblical account of Noah’s flood as opposed to the utter foolishness of evolution theory. Credits: Mr. John Heffner Page 8 |
 |
Page 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sal Giardina and his wife, Pam have a very unique and informative ministry of sharing truths regarding the Biblical creation. They are available for seminars and travel to churches presenting many of these Biblical and scientific facts to expose the lie of evolution. Sal is a geologist with the knowledge to refute many modern day scientific theories that do not agree with the Word of God. People of all ages would be blessed to hear this entire presentation of these important truths. Sal can be contacted at his email address below to schedule a seminar in your church or youth group.
Sal Giardina email: sal_pam@mymail.net
Web Site Address: http://www.myhomepage.net/~sal_pam
